Recently (i.e., at the time of this writing since 2015~2016 onwards) new methods to perform sequence labelling tasks based on neural networks started to be proposed/published, I will try in this blog post to do a quick recap of some of these new methods, understanding their architectures and pointing out what each technique brought new or different to the already knew methods.
When you train a NER system the most typically evaluation method is to measure precision, recall and f1-score at a token level. These metrics are indeed useful to tune a NER system. But when using the predicted named-entities for downstream tasks, it is more useful to evaluate with metrics at a full named-entity level. In this post I will go through some metrics that go beyond simple token-level performance.
Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets) have in the past years shown break-through results in some NLP tasks, one particular task is sentence classification, i.e., classifying short phrases (i.e., around 20~50 tokens), into a set of pre-defined categories. In this post I will explain how ConvNets can be applied to classifying short-sentences and how to easily implemented them in Keras.
I found myself, from time to time, always bumping into a piece of code (written by someone else) to perform grid search across different models in scikit-learn and always adapting it to suit my needs, and fixing it, since it contained some already deprecated calls. I finally decided to post it here in my blog, so I can quickly find it and also to share it with whoever needs it.
Stanford NER is a named-entity recognizer based on linear chain Conditional Random Field (CRF) sequence models. This post details some of the experiments I’ve done with it, using a corpus to train a Named-Entity Recognizer: the features I’ve explored (some undocumented), how to setup a web service exposing the trained model and how to call it from a python script.
This is the third and (maybe) the last part of a series of posts about sequential supervised learning applied to NLP. In this post I will talk about Conditional Random Fields (CRF), explain what was the main motivation behind the proposal of this model, and make a final comparison between Hidden Markov Models (HMM), Maximum Entropy Markov Models (MEMM) and CRF for sequence prediction.
This is the second part of a series of posts about sequential supervised learning applied to NLP. It can be seen as a follow up on the previous post, where I tried do explain the relationship between HMM and Naive Bayes. In this post I will try to explain how to build a sequence classifier based on a Logistic Regression classifier, i.e., using a discriminative approach.
This is the first post, of a series of posts, about sequential supervised learning applied to Natural Language Processing. In this first post I will write about the classical algorithm for sequence learning, the Hidden Markov Model (HMM), explain how it’s related with the Naive Bayes Model and it’s limitations.
In a previous post I explained how load the syntactic and morphological information given by SyntaxNet into NLTK structures by parsing the standard output. Although useful this is does not scale when one wants to process thousands of sentences, but finally I’ve found a Docker image to setup SyntaxNet as a web-service.
The PyData Berlin conference took place in the first weekend July, at the HTW. Full 3 days of many interesting subjects including Natural Language Processing, Machine Learning, Data Visualization, etc. I was happy to have my talk proposal accepted, and had the opportunity to present work done during my PhD on Semantic Relationship extraction.
In May 2016 Google released SyntaxNet, a syntactic parser whose performance beat previous proposed approaches.
Just the first post ever to test everything :-)